So my view is that there are really two separate conversations here.
@EricTinyman I completely agree. My major goal was simply to group together ideas that could be voted on at once rather than hunting for votes for one then another, then another. Since activity is down, I just wanted to ensure that we could possibility get a majority approval on at least one idea 
or if we got approval for all, they could each be presented to Governance at once to decide.
Because I figured we can come to a conclusion on at least one being a good direction and get approval.
And coming from responses on ideas like allowing LP voting rights I wasn’t exactly sure what would be practical for you all to actually implement at this time with tiny price action and overall ecosystem slowdown. I have no expectation that an xgov system would be something that could be implemented quickly and kinda expected it might be something that could be passed and then “tabled” for the moment and just added to the roadmap for the future. Since voting here is the thing that takes the most effort to rally users towards it just seemed easier to go ahead and start hunting down votes for all three. 
I didn’t want to risk an idea like an xtiny token to get voting approval, then it not being a practical solution for you all at this time and have to restart on a new vote for something else, when most of the same people would likely vote on the new proposal as well. 
I just want to find ways to empower those of us who continue to be active on the platform to be able and come together and work on ideas at a quicker pace than we’ve been able to so far. (xgov might also be a solution to the continued concentration of tinypower among govs in the top few dozen, making a consideration of "what matters more, voting power for LP rewards or voting power to push proposals forward).
That is not to say debate and direction from the community at large is a bad thing, it’s just difficult with the conditions we are working with compared to say the launch of Tinyman’s Governance system.
It feels like a lot of govs are in a “wait and see” mode. And I get it, I do. I’m just more of a “how can we come together and make improvements to xyz” even if I’m sitting on a fair amount of unrealized losses.
Of note @EricTinyman There is one small thing I didn’t consider when pushing this vote that I think should be addressed at some point: The minimum yes vote needed to pass a proposal has to my knowledge remained unchanged since launch I think it’s a minimum of 2.5M Yes (assuming also in the majority) That’s a little silly now given our top 13 govs by themselves could pass a measure if only they alone voted and it is less than 2% of our total voting power of all govs. I could not find anything saying it had been updated however.