@ROAM and myself have both been active around Tinyman channels long enough that I think most rational people can confirm we are not bots. Eric has actually seen us around community channels and you can actually find our wallets and voting records rather than hiding behind a generic forum name. Heck my wallet matches my forum name. And my X account. And my Algorand Forum account. And my Reddit. And my Folks Forum account. Notably you can also find posts in these places from my account.
Heh heh, you are funny. So far it has been hard to get even couple votes, but suddenly new people rush to vote… Like c’mon. We both know what is going on.
Regarding last proposal, most were in favor of it, but large holders were against it. This time majority lost, but fairly.
Roam has been around here long enough to have watched me spend months trying to whip 50 actual votes for a proposal before.
We’re not the ones trying to dump our locked Tiny by getting an early unlock. Interestingly you did actually vote against a method to combat this: That would ensure actual govs vote in advancing proposals.
Improvements to our Goverance System an xGov Pilot program
The only real voting that matters seems to be onchain voting because you cant spin up fake accounts - only real voting power with actual money behind it and real voters matter & it is all transparent voting on the blockchain so the system can’t be gamed.
Except it can be gamed. We’ve watched SHOB do it for months, funneling tiny rewards to a scam token he owns all the liquidity for, that he owns all the supply for, that there’s zero community or administrative backing for.
So I ask:
Why do YOU want to handout tiny from our operational budget accounts that are not being used atm, funnel the largest single share of the balance to one account, who has used his tinypower to just suck rewards from a mostly inactive LP of a scam token?
How does that reward the community?
How does that secure Tinyman?