Hey man, I don’t know, you can ask the team to give you the list, or you’d have to go one by one, lol!
1 Like
Well I’ve messaged all the ones I can copy-paste, I just noted if it’s too long of an address tinyman’s UI doesn’t allow you to see the full address.
So anything with a … in the middle of the address you can’t send a note to via a drop.
I see, please go to the Discord, I got a present for you there, lol!
1 Like
I have @'d MeldGold and Algomint on x asking for help spreading word in their respective x circles given I’m sure there’s some overlap in people involved/following their x accounts and our current list of tiny govs. Adding liquidity in their respective LPs is beneficial to them as well after-all.
I may look around for their respective social sites and do some poking around.
1 Like
No worries, we’ll push through!
Rome wasn’t built in a day.
Also potently voters, consider what a fund like this could go towards:
- Matching grants from the Algorand Foundation
- Advertising drives to push more users to Tinyman
- injecting much-needed energy into our community
- a reason to give some VC’s hesitancy to dump on us all at once
- an added reason to lock Tinyman to have input over how the funds are directed
- creating core Tinyman groups focusing on unique growth tracks and plans for Tinyman expansion like: working on creating blog articles, vlogs, social media campaigns – Real Decentralized Growth campaings
- energy in our community to then turn into growth potenal, working together to boost LP pairings important to Tinyman and Algorand as a whole
- working together with other defi protocols to develop campaigns that benefit us both: like perhaps working with Folks Governance to establish enhanced rewards on LPs that benefit us both like FUSDC/FALGO, and other often overlooked fasset pairings and combining forces to highlight the rewards those innovative pools bring to us both.
you can request the list of all governance with Tinyman API, for example to get top-50:
https://mainnet.analytics.tinyman.org/api/v1/governance/accounts/?limit=50&offset=0
but don’t waste your time copying those manually, much faster with script.
See documentation here: Tinyman Analytics API Documentation
2 Likes
Hey newcomers! If you are looking for the specific post in question that holds the poll you need to vote on it’s here:
If you are looking specifically for the post involving the formalized proposal:
1 Like
Of note, we are very close to those 50 votes.
If you are active in Algorand spaces on X spaces at all send them the poll link.
Maybe you can poke around for a few votes among algo fam we’ve not bullied (kidding) into voting 
.
1 Like
WE DID IT. 
Look, I hope a lot of govs that haven’t been around in a bit pop in here from the proposal being live will please turn on notifications for “Proposal Discussion” and “Governance Proposals” categories.
Turn on “watching” so you get a notification of new proposals needing community input and voting 
There’s more we can do that I think will complement this step if it passes, but I’d rather not fight for votes for months because not enough people know there’s a vote to be held
As govs there’s not a lot individually we can do to affect price of course, but there is a lot, imo that we can do together to help Tinyman grow and develop, as well as expanding our impact across Algorand.
Not to be too cheesy, but together we are Tiny Strong 
. I do mean that.
2 Likes
so there will be on-chain voting in the near future? or how we proceed from here?
1 Like
Assuming I submitted everything correctly
It’s pending review/approval atm. If my understanding is correct after approval it will be listed, have 48 hours I think to be reviewed by gov, and I think it’s a week of voting?
It’s possible I may submitted it incorrectly but I haven’t gotten any feedback either-way and it is still “pending” on the platform.
Maybe we should consider an on-site submission forum that would go directly from the Tinyman UI to mods (given how… persistent scammers are). This process has opened up some slight issues with our current setup (mostly due to the general lackluster performance of Algorand and Tinyman and alts in general across the board imo).
I do have concerns about the idea of a discord-based forum that has been suggested, although that is mostly due to scammers as well.
The submission, votes, and process for this has made me wonder about an xGov version of Tinyman Gov, one that perhaps could be based around teams of users for things like getting eyes on proposals for submission, a team for planning advertising ideas, etc, based on our relative strengths and areas of interest, coordination on tinypower to push farms that are beneficial to Tinyman and Algorand overall (agreeing for x amount of govs to support x farms long-term with Tinypower – it does not have to be all at once or anything, say maybe 10% from a group of govs for 3 months, or etc enough to try to reach having a minimum amount of tiny power being directed to specific tinyman important farms – like tiny/usdc or ecosystem important farms like usdc/gobtc, fusdc/fgobtc, etc.
Tiny could be traded for something akin to an xgov token (xtiny? Whatever) and locked to push proposals infront of Tinyman gov at large rather than forum votes alone.
@NerdyForDesign Clarification on Tinyman Treasury & Fee Mechanics
We would like to clarify how the Tinyman treasury and fee collection actually work, as there seems to be a misunderstanding underlying the recent proposal.
Tinyman’s fee treasury is not held in TINY.
It is primarily composed of USDC and tALGO–USDC pool tokens.
How fees are collected and managed:
• Swap fees are collected multiple times per hour
• Nearly all assets collected as fees are converted to USDC, except ALGO
• 20% of total protocol fees are used to buy back and burn TINY
• The remaining ALGO is converted into tALGO–USDC
• ALGO held by the treasury is staked
• Small amounts of other assets (e.g. mALGO, xALGO) may temporarily accumulate, but these are minimal and periodically converted
This fee treasury is used to cover ongoing operating costs, including salaries and infrastructure, on a month-to-month basis.
Regarding TINY holdings:
• Tinyman also holds company-allocated TINY
• Portions of vested TINY are occasionally converted to USDC to support company expenses
• There is additional unused and unvested TINY belonging to the protocol
• Converting large amounts of TINY into other assets (e.g. goBTC or FOLKS) would introduce significant additional selling pressure and is therefore not prudent under current market conditions
Tinyman Treasury allocation:
• 32.925M TINY (24.85% of initial allocation)
• 12-month cliff, followed by 24 months linear vesting
• Selling unlocked TINY for diversification purposes at this stage would negatively impact TINY price stability
Conclusion
Because Tinyman’s treasury is already diversified by design through fee collection, and because selling TINY for diversification would currently be counterproductive, there is no need to implement the proposed treasury diversification plan at this time.
That said, we sincerely appreciate the community’s engagement and the thoughtful intent behind the proposal. Community-driven discussion around sustainability and long-term strategy is always welcome, and we’re grateful to see such active participation.
Based on the clarifications above, this proposal will be withdrawn.
1 Like