In the same way the proposal that just passed is allocating trading fee funds to burn Tiny and reduce Emissions, I propose that we use trading fees at the same percent [1/6th (0.05%) of the fee is allocated to the Tinyman protocol (Treasury).] at a later date to buy into more stable liquidity pools such as ALGO/USDC, ALGO/TINY, TINY/USDC, Etc. We would use the funds to buy into these LP’s in which the rewards from the treasury’s share in the pool could be re-allocated to the same purpose or paid out to locked governance token holders. This would be beneficial for multiple reasons. It would build stability and locked equity on the Tinyman ecosystem. It would incentivize long term commitment, holding, and maintaining locked status of the Tiny token as built equity will eventually be paid out to governance token holders. I also propose that the community will get to vote on its top 3-5 LP’s to invest in, which will allow consensus to be reached on what LP’s would be most beneficial to support/supply for long term ecosystem growth. The LP tokens would be owned by the treasury therefore owned proportionally by governance token lockers. And governance token holders would be able to eventually get rewards from the pool proportionally to their locked TINY. This also keeps in line with decentralization, but grows the value of the exchange and reason invest in TINY.
This is not an immediate proposal, however I would like input on what time this should be implemented. help fixing the wording of this proposal, general ideas, and suggestions.
Is this a good Idea??? Long term it would be amazing to have locked equity/volume that is not reliant on good Samaritans funding the Pool. While anyone can still contribute to the LP’s the Tinyman Ecosystem would be more self reliant and that locked volume would be subject to consensus vote from governors before anything could be done with it. More TVL in stable pools would surely be attractive to new users and continued adoption on the exchange.